Re: Have you seen this
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 4:06 pm
I've been trying to work out exactly what PA moderation wants everyone to believe about the stolen donations...I just can't get it straight in my head...anyone care to explain it to me?
Here's the draft for my blog (mods please let me know if this is inappropriate here)...any insight is appreciated, I surly must be missing something:
I’ve been trying to piece together the beliefs of Project Avalon on this one.
If I understand correctly:
Avalon costs in the $4200 ballpark to run, I remember the founder stressing how he barely makes it from the donations back when I was active.
Apparently there is evidence from a member who was trying to send donations to PA, and it was “intercepted” by a PayPal account directed toward Earth Empaths…Christine’s site.
So from the period of time Christine chose to start stealing donations, to whenever Bill or the accountant in charge of monitoring donations and paying the bills (I’m assuming that’d be BR, but not sure) noticed the PayPal account wasn’t getting donations.
I would think this would be difficult to do in the first place…but assuming it’s as easy having access to the site it’s “first lady” would probably be privy to, and she just went in and shut down PA’s Paypal and opened hers in front of it…wouldn’t this trigger some sort of action by paypal…at least an inquiry to the EE account owner as to the validity of the claim they were stealing donations from another site?
And isn’t uncharacteristically and pretty damn-near-insanely stupid for Christine to think she’d “get away” with funneling the probably significantly less than the $4k operating case she’d be able to snatch before her scam was found out?
This is a really interesting study in reality creation to me. The “evidence” forces a sort of cognitive dissonance that leads me to believe he wants me to believe she is dumber than she’s ever shown herself to be capable of being…or that paypal is significantly less secure than they’d have us believe (unless he’s for some reason holding out on documentation here? I mean, I’d think he’d at least be able to get something from paypal acknowledging he’d ask them to look into this heinous theft, no?)
Anyway…I won’t speculate any more…just trying to work this out…I don’t even really understand what I’m supposed to believe……oh what a strange web we weave…
Here's the draft for my blog (mods please let me know if this is inappropriate here)...any insight is appreciated, I surly must be missing something:
I’ve been trying to piece together the beliefs of Project Avalon on this one.
If I understand correctly:
Avalon costs in the $4200 ballpark to run, I remember the founder stressing how he barely makes it from the donations back when I was active.
Apparently there is evidence from a member who was trying to send donations to PA, and it was “intercepted” by a PayPal account directed toward Earth Empaths…Christine’s site.
So from the period of time Christine chose to start stealing donations, to whenever Bill or the accountant in charge of monitoring donations and paying the bills (I’m assuming that’d be BR, but not sure) noticed the PayPal account wasn’t getting donations.
I would think this would be difficult to do in the first place…but assuming it’s as easy having access to the site it’s “first lady” would probably be privy to, and she just went in and shut down PA’s Paypal and opened hers in front of it…wouldn’t this trigger some sort of action by paypal…at least an inquiry to the EE account owner as to the validity of the claim they were stealing donations from another site?
And isn’t uncharacteristically and pretty damn-near-insanely stupid for Christine to think she’d “get away” with funneling the probably significantly less than the $4k operating case she’d be able to snatch before her scam was found out?
This is a really interesting study in reality creation to me. The “evidence” forces a sort of cognitive dissonance that leads me to believe he wants me to believe she is dumber than she’s ever shown herself to be capable of being…or that paypal is significantly less secure than they’d have us believe (unless he’s for some reason holding out on documentation here? I mean, I’d think he’d at least be able to get something from paypal acknowledging he’d ask them to look into this heinous theft, no?)
Anyway…I won’t speculate any more…just trying to work this out…I don’t even really understand what I’m supposed to believe……oh what a strange web we weave…