Anders wrote:In reality, the whole event was staged, nobody was killed, and it was just a show to scare the crap out of the evil cabal and keep them in line.
I think we have to back up a bit and examine two things that have a major impact on our respective perspectives: 1) the idea that JFK wasn't really killed, and that no one died on 9/11, and 2) that there is any reliability or veracity in the story of Jesus Christ. ...
Perhaps we should start with 9/11 and your claim that no one died. How did you arrive at this conclusion? What is your evidence? How do you explain the conflict between no deaths on 9/11 and the lack of interest in saving lives that the sociopathic planners of 9/11 would surely exhibit?
There are about 3,000 people missing in the official death records for NYC on 9/11 2001. And Cluesforum has done extensive research showing a huge number of so-called vicsims, simulated victims in the 9/11 attacks. And the supposed jumpers have been shown to have anomalies, i.e. I believe they were just dummies thrown out of windows and/or CGI fakery.
The 9/11 attacks were planned already before the WTC towers were built. It's a very long-term plan. Not something a bunch of sociopaths would have the patience to carry out. The towers were built to be demolished like that. And the memorials of JFK and 9/11 show how the same planners were behind both events:
If my theory is correct, then what does it predict? Well, we can compare my theory to the the opposite idea, that the evil cabal killed JFK and killed a lot of people in the 9/11 attacks. If that was true, what was their purpose? Many would say that their purpose is to bring in an Orwellian New World Order. So, does that look like what has happened? No. Donald Trump is hardly promoting a New World Order.
According to my prediction, Donald Trump is a white hat working together with the breakaway civilization. Sure, terrorism will probably continue, and the Trump administration may even go to war somewhere like in Syria. But that's just to keep the situation in the world and for the U.S. stable. As I wrote earlier, we will still need to have things like military forces and stuff in the world. It will probably take decades before things start to change a lot on an external level.
What my theory predicts is that we will not see a radical increase in terrorism, nor a massive increase in military conflicts around the world. There will probably not even be any financial crash or any radical changes in the monetary systems.
In, short, I predict that the situation in the world will remain fairly stable. Pretty boring prediction. The purpose of the staged JFK assassination and the 9/11 attacks is to remove the power from the evil cabal, not to increase the cabal's power. The exciting part of my prediction is what will be introduced instead of a New World Order and that is an earth consciousness, and that will start as an internal transformation within us as individuals, not as some external political changes.
What we have here is a complete failure of the system, it inverts on itself again and again and with each inversion gets easier to see ... it is glitching everywhere. My prediction is that the "controllers" have nil possibility of pulling their agenda off.
The journey, the challenge is to step into the
projection room and stop being lost in the script.
Christine wrote:What we have here is a complete failure of the system, it inverts on itself again and again and with each inversion gets easier to see ... it is glitching everywhere. My prediction is that the "controllers" have nil possibility of pulling their agenda off.
You may be correct. I was just writing a post in line with the idea of a failing system:
Eeek! Does my theory predict that a technological singularity will NOT happen? I'm not sure yet, but it's possible that our technological progress will actually slow down instead of continuing accelerating. Here is what Ray Kurzweil predicts:
There are several practical obstacles to consider. Take self-driving cars for example. How long will it take before the legal issues have been solved? And 3D printers, is that really something big tech companies want to develop or are they seeing 3D printing as a threat and will therefore buy smaller companies and kill them? And biotech, is the healthcare and pharma industry really interested in making people healthy? I don't think so. And new energy technologies, they are blocked by secret patents, by misleading the public scientific community and perhaps even prevented by the big energy corporations such as the oil industry. And the exponential progress of information technology, that may be slowing down, such as discussed in this video: “Moore’s Law Is Really Dead: What Next?” at ACM Turing 50 Celebration -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzaZFyn-iJ0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Oh, fuck. The world is coming to a grinding halt! Well, not stopping but the progress is slowing down. The business and financial world is stuck in its own dinosaur like structure where big corporations and financial institutions protect their rigid positions. And governments have become almost immobilized by all the cover ups they need to manage all the time. Ole Dammegard has done a brilliant job exposing false flag after false flag all around the world.
The U.S. has been particularly heavily targeted because of its dominant position in the world. And one purpose of events like 9/11 and Sandy Hook is to force the government to maintain a huge amount of cover ups.
Mainstream media is becoming more and more cartoonish by the day. And alternative media is a heap of contradictory mess.
Mainstream science and academia are paralyzed by having been tricked into adopting false theories that they now have to stick to and defend.
And according to my theory this is a part of the long term plan. The caterpillar (our current civilization) is turning into a fricken cocoon!
So there is now a desperate need to focus on spiritual solutions. The materialistic road ahead has been blocked.
Anders wrote:There are about 3,000 people missing in the official death records for NYC on 9/11 2001. And Cluesforum has done extensive research showing a huge number of so-called victims, simulated victims in the 9/11 attacks. And the supposed jumpers have been shown to have anomalies, i.e. I believe they were just dummies thrown out of windows and/or CGI fakery.
And you don't question these opinions? You accept them as fact? Conspiracy researchers are known to get it wrong much of the time too. Online forums are loaded with people who think they have the answers, when they clearly don't.
Anders wrote:The 9/11 attacks were planned already before the WTC towers were built. It's a very long-term plan. Not something a bunch of sociopaths would have the patience to carry out. The towers were built to be demolished like that.
1. It makes no sense to build something as magnificent as the Twin Towers just to blow them up. Sociopaths do not behave that way. They are opportunistic, meaning they tend to destroy things non-sociopaths have built to last.
2. Sociopaths are known for their long-term, cross-generational planning. Though they can be impatient with some things, they can also be very patient with their agendas to increase their power and control over others. Due to the nature of their goal, they have to move slowly and clandestinely so that we won't notice.
Anders wrote:And the memorials of JFK and 9/11 show how the same planners were behind both events:
That's a real stretch, in my opinion. Humans tend to construct lots of things that are rectangular in shape. We also tend to invent connections and correlations between things that are not necessarily co-dependent or related.
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
Chicodoodoo wrote:Sociopaths are known for their long-term, cross-generational planning. Though they can be impatient with some things, they can also be very patient with their agendas to increase their power and control over others. Due to the nature of their goal, they have to move slowly and clandestinely so that we won't notice.
Okay, that may be true, I don't know, but what is the result of the 9/11 attacks? Has the military industrial complex really been boosted, other than by the temporary embarrassment of the Iraq war started with the excuse of Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction? The trillions of dollars war in Afghanistan was started to find Osama Bin Laden, i.e. to fight terrorism, not to start a war. And what happened with the terrifying terror brand al-Qaeda? Were they replaced by a militaristic terror group called ISIS, or is it ISIL or IS? Pretty bad rebranding, don't you think?
In short, if the evil cabal really is good at long-term planning, why such enormous effort just to fail miserably with their goal?
HOLY COWLICK ANDERS.
Okay I dug around and found 2 cents and thought I would jump in and out of these conversations above. First of all I have to state this, Anders, I see mostly in your posts that you leave yourself a backdoor although a lot of your writing almost sorta semi somewhat declares a truth. I see that you do a lot of research. I also see your back doors as using the catch words such as "My Theory", IMO, and "My Predictions". Great commentary on so many different subjects though. I do like to read. Chicodoodoo is holding up the other side to your insinuations and Predictions.
I guess what drove into this was your assumption that no one died in the 9/11 false flag. And a huge false fraud it was for sure. People did die and so almost every false fraud that is performed by our terrorist corporation that pretends to be the US government along with all the all the other corporations that are franchises of the one that resides in DC, someone dies or many die or thousands die or even millions die and this organization does not care one hoot who dies as long as they accomplish a goal. Here is something "Follow the Money" JFK was assassinated plain and clear and it surely was not the lone gunman from a third story book building. As Chico says The killer bullet came from the front and the CIA is suspect along with the psychopaths in DC.
You see he was killed because he wanted to disband the CIA, he wanted to kick the Central bank, Federal Reserve, a Private bank by the way out and he understood how the Military industrial complex was controlling. Just one of those false flag, get rid of the dissenter type of things.
This country's government has been pulling false frauds off for ever, Here is a short list, The USS Maine that started the Spanish American War where 266 men were killed. The Lusitania where women and children were killed to get the first world war started, Pearl Harbor where military and civilians were killed. The second world war, How many died in that monstrous murder all for money? The gulf of tonkin USS Maddox incident that kicked off the Vietnam war and how many young men died there? So lets skip write up to 9/11 which it was said by this fucking psychopath just prior to it happening, Remember the asshole called DICK FUCKING CHANEY. He actually stated that this country needed another pearl harbor type of incident, And that other psychopath, Donald Rumsfeld actually telling the American public one day before the incident that the pentagon could not account for 2.3 trillion dollars, The just lost it and the next day it was forgotten.
Now as for the twin towers and building 7 it so proven that they were controlled demolition projects. I do know something about architecture and structural engineering and ain't no way a stupid jet airliner could have brought the two buildings down, Such bullshit and the American public bought it hook line and sinker. Where did the blame go. To 11 or so stupid poor dumb Terrorists that supposedly were part of something called Al Qaeda. Bullshit again. So the only false fraud that I do believe no one got killed in was the stupid Sandy hook thing and maybe the Boston bombing. That seems to be a no brainer due to the incredible amount of evidence.
The talk of sociopaths here needs to go more toward the psychopaths so here is just a small definition of that
Psychopath
It is time to note the difference between a psychopath and a psychotic.
Psychopath:
A person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse.
Psychopaths tend to lack normal human emotions such as guilt. They are also often highly intelligent and skilled at manipulating others.
Also, psychopaths seem to appear normal. You would probably never guess there was something wrong with them.
Note, not all psychopaths are serial killers.
Ted Bundy was a psychopath, but Richard Chase was a psychotic.
and then there is this
Psychopaths and Sociopaths Aren’t The Same
Some media outlets or older educational materials may refer to psychopathy and sociopathy interchangeably, but the most recent research says this isn’t accurate. Though both conditions are associated with a poor sense of “right and wrong” and a lack of empathy, there are a few key differences between them. According to Dr. L. Michael Tompkins, a psychologist at the Sacramento County Mental Health Treatment Center, the difference lies in having a conscience. A psychopath simply doesn’t have one, he told WebMD. They will steal from you without feeling a twinge of guilt — though they may pretend to if they’re caught, so they aren’t “found out.” A sociopath, on the other hand, will understand that taking your money is wrong and may feel remorse, but it won’t be enough to stop their deviant behavior. A psychopath has less regard for others than a sociopath.
Another difference between the two lies in the psychopath’s incredible ability to blend in. They can come off as charming, intelligent, and may even mimic emotions they really don’t feel. “They’re skilled actors whose sole mission is to manipulate people for personal gain,” Tompkins said. Sociopaths are more likely to come off as “hot-headed,” and may act more impulsively, demonstrating to others their lack of normal empathy.
Well I spent a little more than two cents so thanks
Steven
Anders wrote:In short, if the evil cabal really is good at long-term planning, why such enormous effort just to fail miserably with their goal?
They didn't fail miserably. Quite the contrary.
The Afghanistan invasion and conflict didn't cost the evil cabal trillions of dollars, not at all. It brought in trillions of dollars via the illicit drug trade, which expanded greatly under their new management. The U.S. taxpayers got stuck with the bill in the form of devalued currency and increased debt. The Iraq War 2 likewise profited the evil cabal handsomely, with the cost borne once again by Americans and other dollar users. Remember that the ruling sociopaths are parasites that feed off others. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are hired mercenaries working for the evil cabal in their ceaseless pursuit of even more power and greater profits.
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
I appreciate the discussion about 9/11, JFK and other truther topics, but I now want to look at it from a perspective above all that mess. Conspiracy theories have been discussed for decades over and over again. Even myself I have been looking into conspiracy theories for several years. Been there, done that, got the Infowars.com T-shirt (well, not yet, but you get the picture).
Some people in the alternative community have called earth a prison planet and Alex Jones even has a website with that name. That's an incorrect metaphor. It's a mistake to believe that the universe makes mistakes. We live in a planetary quarantine, yes, but that is for the deliberate constructive purpose of developing a new and unique civilization.
A better metaphor is that we live in a cosmic sandbox. And the physical atoms in our world are cosmic Lego bricks. That's why we are starting to recognize our world as being cartoonish. It's not a cosmic joke although it may appear like that from our current perspective. Our fallen world, lila, maya, samsara and other descriptions like that are serious metaphors for the suffering caused by being confined to the sandbox.
The breakaway civilization has broken free from the sandbox. But they can't pull us out of it against our own free will. Besides, we need to grow out of the sandbox ourselves, not be dragged out of it by some extraterrestrial forces.
Does my theory predict that a technological singularity will NOT happen? I'm not sure yet, but it's possible that our technological progress will actually slow down instead of continuing accelerating. Here is what Ray Kurzweil predicts:
