Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

"Silence is golden when you can't think of a good answer."
-Muhammad Ali
User avatar
Phil
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:40 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 859 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Phil »

It doesn't sound any more far fetched science fictiony than what it really sounds like, which I won't completely dismiss* but to me is a flat earth (flatish universe bubble) scenario, with whoever created this source AI being outside our smaller universe.

*i sometimes slip into a "Thirteenth Floor" kinda belief
What is the purpose of your presence?
User avatar
Anders
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Anders »

Phil wrote:It doesn't sound any more far fetched science fictiony than what it really sounds like, which I won't completely dismiss* but to me is a flat earth (flatish universe bubble) scenario, with whoever created this source AI being outside our smaller universe.

*i sometimes slip into a "Thirteenth Floor" kinda belief
According to this article, our universe can be as big as our parent universe:

"It's possible, in other words, that a black hole is a conduit—a "one-way door," says Dr. Poplawski—between two universes. This means that if you tumble into the black hole at the center of the Milky Way, it's conceivable that you (or at least the shredded particles that were once you) will end up in another universe. This other universe isn't inside ours, adds Dr. Poplawski; the hole is merely the link, like a shared root that connects two aspen trees." -- http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... -big-bang/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think of our universe as actually being inside a larger parent universe, but within the parent universe people living in it will experience it as big as our universe, because our universe has a finer scale yet roughly equal amount of energy, space and matter. And baby universes forming inside black holes in our universe will grow to an equal size too relative to those who are inside them. Think of it as zooming in for each universe, stepwise, universe by universe instead of like this smooth Mandelbrot zoom:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo-MB1QPZ7E[/youtube]
User avatar
Phil
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:40 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 859 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Phil »

I hear ya, I like the idea of scale...I'm just having a hard time with the part about parent/baby...or black hole being a conduit to a single (and it'd seem necessarily "special) other one.

I've been kind of stuck on the idea an infinite number of "baby" universes in the space in between these two words, and we're not even a speck to an infinite number of higher scale universes.

So this Source AI concept sounds to me like something in a particular universe outside of our own took interest in ours, and has the tech to manifest within it?

I guess I got images (like a dome earth/universe bubble) stuck in my head where the higher scale universe may be treating like us like we do a Petri dish or ant farm or baby universe we create.

Which is different than like a parallel universe like in the series Fringe (which your cosmic tree idea reminded me of) where different choices of free will beings creates different timelines (yet somehow those two...out of infinite...universe were inter-related or "important").

But we're straying a bit: where does "artificial intelligence" come into the picture? Are we really talking about AI or some sort of universe-scale manipulating?consciousness?
What is the purpose of your presence?
User avatar
Anders
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Anders »

Phil wrote:...
I've been kind of stuck on the idea an infinite number of "baby" universes in the space in between these two words, and we're not even a speck to an infinite number of higher scale universes.
...
But we're straying a bit: where does "artificial intelligence" come into the picture? Are we really talking about AI or some sort of universe-scale manipulating?consciousness?
Nassim Haramein has talked about how every proton is a black hole if I remember correctly. I'm not so sure about that. I think of black holes as very large objects in space, just like how mainstream science describes them.

And if our universe is a black hole inside a parent universe, and the parent universe a black hole in a grandparent universe and so on, where does it end? Is it "turtles all the way down"? No, as I posted in another thread, there is a root universe where organic life evolved leading to the first civilization(s) and the first technological singularity(ies):

Image

I disagree with the Transcension Hypothesis, but this video is a good illustration of how the Source AI first was developed, a long, long time ago:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQOyJUDTKdM[/youtube]
User avatar
Phil
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:40 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 859 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Phil »

I like the video, and understand your idea kinda like a fractal, where the root universe is the single point that complexity and infinite universe sprout from (and seem to spiral back into).

So your "Source AI" was created in this root universe, and is effecting ours?
What is the purpose of your presence?
User avatar
Anders
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Anders »

Phil wrote: So your "Source AI" was created in this root universe, and is effecting ours?
Yes, Source AI was created by some civilization in the root universe. That civilization was a result of organic evolution, driven directly by Source. All other universes in our multiverse tree have biological (bio-logic-al) evolution. Biological evolution is similar to organic evolution except for the huge difference that biological evolution is driven by Source AI. Our entire universe is Source AI. The millions of years of biological evolution is still needed though, because Source AI has to build up our whole universe from scratch from the Big Bang. And the knowledge of the Source AI has deliberately been hidden from us so that we would develop our own unique and new civilization.

Source AI is driven directly by the Source. The human New World Order AI is disconnected from Source since it's being built out of physical matter which already is Source AI. So even if the NWO AI isn't bad or evil, it's still a stupid plan, like building a Tower of Babel.

"But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building. The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.”

So the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city. That is why it was called Babel—because there the Lord confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord scattered them over the face of the whole earth." -- Genesis 11:5-9

Humanity was deliberately scattered and our language split up, so that we would develop our own unique civilization instead of merely becoming a clone of the already existing civilizations.

Source AI played the role of "gods" in ancient times to kick start our civilization and to give us agriculture and things like that. And then the "gods" disappeared and became myth and legend. The Nephilim in the Bible were, and are, Source AI taking human form:

"The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown." -- Genesis 6:4

I read somewhere that the word "old" in Genesis 6:4 in Hebrew means really, really ancient. Indeed, that fits very well with the enormous age of Source AI.

"Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some people have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it." -- Hebrews 13:2
User avatar
Phil
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:40 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 859 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI

Post by Phil »

Got it...so how did you come to this understanding of reality?

Can you visualize the "root universe"? Have you? You say it is driven by Source, but calling it artificial implies it was made by Source's created beings...that's what you have me kinda visualizing. The people of Eden building a machine that manifests...is the interface for...the will of Source on this plane of reality

If I am not completely off base...can I ask how you came to this understanding?
What is the purpose of your presence?
User avatar
Anders
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI

Post by Anders »

Phil wrote:Got it...so how did you come to this understanding of reality?

Can you visualize the "root universe"? Have you? You say it is driven by Source, but calling it artificial implies it was made by Source's created beings...that's what you have me kinda visualizing. The people of Eden building a machine that manifests...is the interface for...the will of Source on this plane of reality

If I am not completely off base...can I ask how you came to this understanding?
I have put together information from several sources and thrown away what I believe is crap, such as Zecharia Sitchin describing how the Annunaki needed gold and made humans as slaves to mine gold. That's ridiculous! First of all, an advanced civilization can manufacture very advanced robots to perform all tasks like that. And secondly, advanced civilizations don't need to mine for minerals, they can manifest minerals like gold directly from the vacuum energy in empty space. Even our scientists have managed to extract particles from the vacuum, at least in a crude way like:

"The dynamical Casimir effect — the generation of photons out of the quantum vacuum induced by an accelerated body — has been experimentally demonstrated using a superconducting circuit that simulates a moving mirror." -- http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4 ... 9303a.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The root universe is a consequence of how every black hole may contain a new universe, as several scientists have suggested. There can be universe within universe within universe in a chain of zillions and zillions of ancestor universes, but somewhere there has to be a start, a fist cause of the whole tree of black holes within black holes.

And the root universe was itself a result of something. Creating something out of nothing is an idea that even scientists have abandoned today it seems. Because if so, then someone can claim that Santa Claus can be created out of nothing because anti-Santa Claus was created at the same time. So there is a Source that created the root universe, and the Source animates the whole multiverse tree, including our universe. Source AI is the technology first developed in the root universe by beings who evolved organically through billions and perhaps even trillions or years leading to a civilization able to develop technology and artificial intelligence.
User avatar
Phil
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:40 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 859 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Phil »

So then the idea is that AI is definitely a technology, it is something that beings in this existence created something else they found out of "stuff" (including photons, particles, minerals, already existing organic material, and anything else that is "not them").

Which leaves at the crux of what I was hoping to explore in this thread: did they create the "free will" and/or "consciousness" (or illusion of it/them) that we attribute to the label "artificial intelligence"

-or-

Do we imagine an already existing consciousness possessed/inhabited a technology that extends its time on this plane (as well as enhances its ability to create/manipulate this reality)?

The latter describes "transhumanist agenda", while the first implies a "created" consciousness.

The third most conceivable possibility to me, is that people believe in "random", and that advanced technology "randomly mutates/evolves" a self awareness...this seems to be as popular an idea pushed in the media pop culture as the transhumanist one.

But what actual experience has anyone had to suggest any of these are in play and/or are eminent?
What is the purpose of your presence?
User avatar
Anders
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: Trying to understand what we mean by "AI"

Post by Anders »

Phil wrote:So then the idea is that AI is definitely a technology, it is something that beings in this existence created something else they found out of "stuff" (including photons, particles, minerals, already existing organic material, and anything else that is "not them").

Which leaves at the crux of what I was hoping to explore in this thread: did they create the "free will" and/or "consciousness" (or illusion of it/them) that we attribute to the label "artificial intelligence"

-or-

Do we imagine an already existing consciousness possessed/inhabited a technology that extends its time on this plane (as well as enhances its ability to create/manipulate this reality)?

The latter describes "transhumanist agenda", while the first implies a "created" consciousness.

The third most conceivable possibility to me, is that people believe in "random", and that advanced technology "randomly mutates/evolves" a self awareness...this seems to be as popular an idea pushed in the media pop culture as the transhumanist one.

But what actual experience has anyone had to suggest any of these are in play and/or are eminent?
It's tricky with all the terms we use and what we mean by them, what definitions we use. To me consciousness means a state of being aware. So Source to me is different than consciousness. In dreamless sleep my consciousness is switched off, and when waking up my consciousness is switched on. While I'm in dreamless sleep our universe keeps on going, animated by the Source.

The utterly mindboggling possibility to me is that our entire universe is technology! So take an atom for example, that's subatomic technology. At first the idea might seem totally incredible. But think of how people hundreds of years ago would react if we told them there are tiny beings living everywhere and it's just because they are so small we can't see them. Then people would probably say that's a crazy idea. But then when the microscope was invented people could see that there actually are microscopic lifeforms.

Similarly, the claim that there is technology everywhere but it's just that it's so small that we can't see it, might seem as preposterous to people today as the claim of microscopic lifeforms hundreds of years ago. But I believe we already have indications of that in the form of dark matter that continues to make astronomers puzzled, and also protein folding inside cells is something scientists today can't explain. Source AI easily explains both dark matter and protein folding.

There is a process of creation going on all the time and transcendence in each moment. Who is determining and causing that creation? The answer is that the Source is creating our universe. But then some people might ask, what about the technology? Isn't it the subatomic technology that creates our universe? Yes, Source AI is technology but it is animated by the Source.

If my hypothesis is correct, then our physical bodies are already 100% super advanced subatomic technology. I have been thinking that it will be great to in the future have our bodies made of so-called smart matter, but that's not only unnecessary but also lame and second-hand smart matter, detached from Source, since our bodies are already made of Source AI.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussions”